Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: OPERA OPTICAL BEACON (way off topic) but is based on 17 K

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: OPERA OPTICAL BEACON (way off topic) but is based on 17 KHz :)
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 23:24:19 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <7E9EB5FA653147298EEBB4676DCDD9DD@White>
References: <4084B089A7FF496CAC1CE9A2459B9C47@AGB> <7E9EB5FA653147298EEBB4676DCDD9DD@White>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
What's  you  measured  error  ? ..taking  one  is  peak  and one  is  average  and  the  beach mark is  different  as well,  direct  read-out testing  is not  satisfactory. 
 
Over a live  radio  path  the  statement  is reasonably  correct  , op2  may  on the  + side  and  op4  on the  - side 
I think the  statement is  technically  correct, however , the  differences in the  calibration  and  method  do  present  a  technical quandary .
 
Similar   =   having a resemblance in appearance, character, or quantity, without being identical:
 
In parallel  transmission test  over  25  miles  on  500 k , the  two  modes  randomly  decoded at and  around the  same  level
 
However system implementation  is the key  , simplicity  of use , with  minimal  hardware requirements.  as can be  seen on the  136  band , many  stations  are  using  the  system with  some  very  good  results , hopefully  for  field   work  with  optical  systems  it  will  give a reliable  lap-top based  SDR   measuring  system .  
 
73 -G..
 
 
 
 
 

Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: LF: OPERA OPTICAL BEACON (way off topic) but is based on 17 KHz :)

From: Graham
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:18 PM
Subject: LF: OPERA OPTICAL BEACON (way off topic) but is based on 17 KHz :)

...

> and OP2  has  similar  sensitivity as  the  wspr  system.

...

 

this is definitely not true.
 
73, Markus
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>