Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:54:30 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <41E179E8BC3D497AB344D966959A61C6@White> <[email protected]> <386BA5055A494FEC9164314A593DCB8D@White> <000901cd98a8$7cd20a00$76761e00$@com> <C3E02A3724554E53B4510102CA8557AB@White> <[email protected]> <972D0C66C74A41968A7D806701F5EDD6@AGB> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Stefan
 
If you  can  generate  the signal  of your  previous  tests , I don't  think  the  range  will  be that  short  !!
 
Due to the  long  tx pulses  of  OP4 Hr  , the  signal  will  also  show  on spec-lab , so  test  data  is not  lost  , if  decode  fails .
 
The  software  produces  the  8K audio  tone  via  the  sound  card and has the com-port  on/off  keying  output as well  ,  normal  sound cards  are  suitable  , the  software inputs  directly  at  8K  using  sound  card  as  SDR
 
If you  have a  target  date ,  I can  post  in the  Op  group  for  monitor's
 
73-G.

Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32

I'll give it a try Graham. The problem may be to find monitoring stations in a short range...

73, Stefan

Am 22.09.2012 17:20, schrieb Graham:
And of course  there  is a   240  SDR  data    mode  , all  ready  for  8Khz  tested  to  -50 dB  as bench mark   : )

Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32

Hi all,

Hmmm, theoretically we can generate every WSPR speed now. Markus, should we try a WSPR-256 on VLF/ 8970 Hz? :-) I still have the big coil in the cellar and the band looks fine :-)
Remember the "old" times... http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html

73, Stefan/DK7FC
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>