Re: LF: DUAL BEACON WSPR + OPERA 500Khz

[Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>]

Hi Graham,

Likewise I still prefer WSPR. 

Decodes occur at similar levels to OP2 and the interface and web database features make it the more attractive mode, for me. I'll continue to play with both though and make a more informed view later. The OOK feature of OPERA I can see is attractive for many. 

Hope to be QRP testing again this evening, probably TXing on WSPR and monitoring both WSPR and OPERA on 500kHz USB dial. I would like to find out if GM4SLV can decode me on either mode using my current set-up. Will you be around John P-G?

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 14 July 2012 13:25, Albert <westberg@xs4all.nl> wrote:

Graham,

Regarding your dual mode 500 kHz tests yesterday. For me the absolute winner is WSPR, when Opera stopped to decode, due to QSB, WSPR continued with decodes at least 3 to 4 dB deeper into the noise.

73, Albert PA0A

QRT  0000z

 

Thanks  all  for  reports 

 

73 -Graham,

From: Graham

Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 7:06 PM

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Subject: LF: DUAL BEACON WSPR + OPERA 500Khz

All,

 

DUAL  BEACON   WSPR + OPERA   500Khz

 

Running   dual  beacon  , parallel   Tx times ......Tx   100%   duty cycle

 

Dial  set   500.000  Khz  USB 

 

73 - Graham

G0NBD

 

 

 

-- 
 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/