Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Test signal needed

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Test signal needed
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:29:37 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAB195C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

MF,

I took the QRSS/CW beacon signal from IQ2MI as the test signal. It was very well audible here, R5. It was interesting to see the deep QSB. Both, my small active antenna and the transmit antenna show the same S/N but maybe it would be useful to use a antenna switch to compare the S/N without having a time delay (changing the antenna cables), due to the QSB...

73s..

Am 20.06.2012 00:44, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
Rik, MF,

Right now i'm testing the TX antenna as a RX antenna. This works much better than expected. A 10 dB attenuator is needed but no problem. Maybe you can give me a test signal again on 502 kHz, or someone else?

It looks like the QRN is much lower on that antenna. That means that many of the crashes during my CQ calls have been charged rain drops that were falling on the E field probe, just my guess.

I will listen another 20 min. on 502 kHz and apprechiate any test signals from amateurs.

73, Stefan




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>