To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ?? |
From: | M0FMT <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:36:33 +0100 (BST) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1339767393; bh=n9x4wst2JobxMN+oUfcqAvvuFmaALMcvr0NMuMR5Jb4=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TMgD+Hos7VBZxCfjw5o1wfOPAWPy9MkLVXvg02k1yGQHKpAbqwFxWytiTZVSthLPMmEgh3C8em5EJT7i1ZOZw25Vi0LpbpF/xgSFFowQCz0e2Ie8fhkTIgrSIf6Jz6fxXb1jOlmUbribQWHKwPTCJ1csiGdaeFDD3FsO2E0QY7w= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=apdkwJhSAl5zg42Qy3ZRgcjgpMm4GRHDczCa0Aras0jnq17MQpfhKu7cmzL8PkkJUCFU0dP9WzlmXuqkwez2KTyg/kAWsN/rm/pPlwT7Dz+MY7liLsEyFal7rMfUX1Ah9iE2WPQJVRPmv/YoAxVMQAa8w/sQ02rBHrw2O10Uf68=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <2C0E979FCD1845DC8B3CA6CBBED621F0@AGB> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAAD50C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
I'd go with that Albert. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX From: Albert <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, 15 June 2012, 10:54 Subject: Re: LF: RE: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ?? G, Just to start the discussion, my proposal is dial 477 kHz. 73, Albert |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Fw: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ?, ken . h . wright |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Beacon to the west, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ??, Albert |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ??, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |