Can you resend the attachment in a format we can actually read.
.PDF would be ideal, but what's wrong with .doc
Andy
G4JNT
On 5 May 2012 16:12, pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Mal, actually the CLUED is just a little more complicated than just 4
> years as a qualifying period. A 10 year period can apply to some aspects
> as you will read in the attachment. The attachment is from a journal
> called Local Government Lawyer and is guidance to those professionally
> engaged in such matters. The appropriate law books have this in more
> detailed and technical form.
>
> Trust this will clarify the position.
>
> If any have problems with .odt I can provide .doc or .rtf
> (in a world of open systems, who needs windows and gates or other
> "Bloatware Inc" products)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:44 +0000, mal hamilton wrote:
>> 4 years is the requirement NOT 10 years
>>
>> de G3KEV
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "pat" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 1:02 PM
>> Subject: Re: LF: UK Ae mast planning info
>>
>>
>> > Hi Peter,
>> >
>> > It's worth bearing in mind that it is possible to obtain a Certificate
>> > of Lawful Development for Existing Use - CLUED. The general proviso
>> > being that you must be able to substantiate that the "existing use" has
>> > persisted for a period of 10 years. Always worth investigating as the
>> > granting of such a certificate is "evidence-based" and not supposed to
>> > be at the whim of an official.
>> >
>> > 73
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 20:38 +0100, Peter Dodd wrote:
>> > > Hi Graham,
>> > > How the mast is fixed into the ground is irrelevant. The planning
>> > > permission is just for the mast. There is no distinction between
>> > > permanent and temporary in the planning laws to my knowledge,
>> > >
>> > > In the past some have tried to circumvent the planning restriction by
>> > > having a portable (mast on trailer) arrangement but I don't think that
>> > > works.
>> > >
>> > > I live in rather a stuffy private estate and I got permission on
>> > > appeal on the grounds that the mast was fold-over and I agreed to only
>> > > have it raised at night. Over the years the people who made all the
>> > > fuss about the antenna have since died and I put it up when I like.
>> > > Whether this is due to indifference or fear that the curse of the
>> > > radio mast will strike again is not known.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Peter, G3LDO
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 26/04/2012 18:53, Graham wrote:
>> > > > Can anyone advise on the planning relevance / requirements to
>> > > > these questions , with regards to Ae pole at the bottom of the
>> > > > garden
>> > > >
>> > > > 1. Is the secure base moveable or is it concreted into the ground?
>> > > > 2. Can the mast be readily removed from the secure base?
>> > > > 3. If the mast is a permanent structure, has the refurbishment
>> > > > resulted in the erection of an entirely new mast,
>> > > >
>> > > > what is the relevance of the base being concreted into the
>> > > > ground ?
>> > > >
>> > > > I assume the question of detaching the pole from the base is
>> > > > one of permanent or temporary structure ?
>> > > >
>> > > > replacing like with like would not be classed as a new mast ?
>> > > >
>> > > > Tnx -G
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > ____________________________________________________________________
>> > > >
>> > > > No virus found in this message.
>> > > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> > > > Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4959 - Release Date:
>> > > > 04/25/12
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > 73 es gd dx de Pat G4GVW, Nr Felixstowe, East Coast, UK
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> --
> 73 es gd dx de Pat G4GVW, Nr Felixstowe, East Coast, UK
|
