To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 29 May 2012 22:40:48 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <003a01cd3cee$0e74a1a0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Gude Peter, LF, I know it is a E field probe. And i know the VLF.it site and design from there :-)Any difference to the E field probe?This IS an e-field probe, but a balanced one. Got the idea from there: http://www.vlf.it/immagine/minimal_E.html (tnx) Where do you have the INA111 from?From Farnell, the TLE2426 voltage splitter too. Thanks! What are the differences on 137 kHz? Is there a significant S/N improvement?Not tested yet. But as I wrote it should work. Do you need a test signal? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Peter, df3lp |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp, pws |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: G3XDV, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp, pws |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp, Chris Dillon |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |