Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp |
| From: | pws <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 May 2012 21:39:06 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <003a01cd3cee$0e74a1a0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111101 SUSE/3.1.16 Thunderbird/3.1.16 |
Moin Stefan, You wrote: ... How sensitive is the balanced probe to shielding effects (trees, houses)? Don't know yet. But see those screenshots. There are much less local interference lines visible. Any difference to the E field probe? This IS an e-field probe, but a balanced one. Got the idea from there: http://www.vlf.it/immagine/minimal_E.html (tnx) Where do you have the INA111 from? From Farnell, the TLE2426 voltage splitter too. What are the differences on 137 kHz? Is there a significant S/N improvement? Not tested yet. But as I wrote it should work. Peter, df3lp |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp, Stefan Schäfer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp, Stefan Schäfer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp, Stefan Schäfer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp, Stefan Schäfer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |