Lubos, Stefan!
Very well Lubos! I'm looking forward to see your signal. QRSS30 would be
a good option and DFCW30 is even better, as Stefan proposed.
I propose the following:
800z: I will "tune in" for a while with a carrier.
830z: I will starting to call CQ until 900z. (QRSS30 or DFCW30)
900z: Listening for your response.....
Stefan: I also prefer DFCW but sometimes SpectrumLab doesn't like me. I
know, not SpectrumLab is the reason for trouble but rather the problem
is in "Layer 8"....Especially in very slow modes it's hard to tell if
one has configured all the parameters right. You just have to wait what
the software does and when you recognize it's wrong, it's too late to
correct.
So from this point of view, slow hell is too much of a challenge to
configure to me until tomorrow.
73
OE3GHB
Gerhard
Am Freitag, den 09.03.2012, 22:01 +0100 schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
>
> Am 09.03.2012 21:42, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:
> >
> > It is fine, you have a plan to transmit tomorrow. I am ready to
> > receive and I am ready to answer as well. My VLF TX set is at home
> > now and it is ready for our first QSO.
> > I know, I can see your FB signal in QRSS30 mode (the QRSS30 window
> > is still open on my Apollo grabber). My signal will not so strong,
> > but there is a good chance you will be able to see it as well. What
> > do you mean, don´t we try it? ;-) I have a time for our tests from
> > the morning up to 13:30 local time.
> >
> >
> > Lubos, OK2BVG
> >
> >
>
> Lubos, Gerhard,
>
> I wish you good luck for the first OE<->OK QSO! Very nice goal.
> Gerhard, since you're using SpecLab to generate the frequency and even
> a audio PA, you can use DFCW instead of QRSS, which makes the QSO
> faster. You could even try slow hell!
> There was no slow hell transmission on the dreamers band at all! (I'm
> always talking about far field experiments, i.e. farer than the own
> garden fence ;-) ).
>
> 73, GL!
> Stefan/DK7FC
|
