To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: DK7FC in VK? |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:07:28 -0400 (EDT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1331802449; bh=Vk1u+CL85M/yht/C3X5LPKEmeOqVRuZKszLc3cuwroI=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Rjp/94Zg1W3Lr/2gT85ICBvEjdKnCU3zLDOPl40OETxhZiJdf96WKaAE1psM3kkJS 0ip2Rq2fN6+WXEExf4KZa8IXSOJBzIL561gDnkgoQeynL1KjuMRNiyqjkXGNLshqxl sylE7f6grTTxSu7iFsuKfjFMxb42PcoOz5b086u8= |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Wow! I'm red-hot with envy ;-)
Attached is another grabber screenshot comparison. The width from DK7FC was halved, and the timescale of VK1SV shifted by 28 minutes. In addition to the perfect "7", we also find earlier weak dashes on the low DFCW frequency, between 18:05 and 18:20. This matches what seems to be have been a transmit keying error, with the callsign ending early in an "F" rather than a "C".
Congratulations to both Stefan and Dimitris on this fantastic result!
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Cc: Gamal Wahid Soegiono <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mi, 14 Mrz 2012 11:42 pm Betreff: LF: DK7FC in VK? LF, Not yet a clear proof but probably i left a first trace in VK on 136.172 kHz in my evening transmission a few hours ago. The VK1SV grabber ( http://people.physics.anu.edu.au/~dxt103/grabber/) showed this spectrogram at about 20:10 UTC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/is%20that%20a%207.jpg It looks pretty equal to a 7 i find. Note the time delay of the time stamp in the spectrogram and in the text box in the left top corner. The correct time is that of the text box. (We don't know where this delay may come from). The delay is exactly 30 minutes. So that 7 must have been on air at about 19:15 UTC. This exactly matches with my own grabber capture which can be seen at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/EU60.jpg Also the frequency matches as well as the DFCW element length and the DFCW shift of my DFCW-180 transmission. As a comparison i generated a 7 in a spectrogram with equal setting as used by Dimitris/VK1SV. Then i cut that 7 and inserted it into the VK grabber capture, see: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/7%20comparison.png Of course we will go on trying in the next time and hope to get a even better proof. In that mode there is little room, i.e. time to receive a complete call. The time is very limited. But maybe we will see a F tomorrow :-) I'm very optimistic you know. That is a path of 16464 km :-) http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN49IK00WD&from=QF44MT 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: Will be quiet tonite due to VLF receive tests. Am 14.03.2012 21:04, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > LF, > > I'm somewhat confused. Can somone look at this link and tell me what > he sees: http://people.physics.anu.edu.au/~dxt103/grabber/ > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC
vk1sv_dk7fc_pasted_120314_2010.jpg |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 8.970Khz, henny van elst |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: DK7FC in VK?, henny van elst |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: DK7FC in VK?, ALAN MELIA |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: DK7FC in VK?, henny van elst |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |