LF,
Not yet a clear proof but probably i left a first trace in VK on 136.172
kHz in my evening transmission a few hours ago.
The VK1SV grabber ( http://people.physics.anu.edu.au/~dxt103/grabber/)
showed this spectrogram at about 20:10 UTC:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/is%20that%20a%207.jpg
It looks pretty equal to a 7 i find.
Note the time delay of the time stamp in the spectrogram and in the text
box in the left top corner. The correct time is that of the text box.
(We don't know where this delay may come from). The delay is exactly 30
minutes.
So that 7 must have been on air at about 19:15 UTC. This exactly matches
with my own grabber capture which can be seen at
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/EU60.jpg
Also the frequency matches as well as the DFCW element length and the
DFCW shift of my DFCW-180 transmission. As a comparison i generated a 7
in a spectrogram with equal setting as used by Dimitris/VK1SV. Then i
cut that 7 and inserted it into the VK grabber capture, see:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/7%20comparison.png
Of course we will go on trying in the next time and hope to get a even
better proof. In that mode there is little room, i.e. time to receive a
complete call. The time is very limited. But maybe we will see a F
tomorrow :-)
I'm very optimistic you know.
That is a path of 16464 km :-)
http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN49IK00WD&from=QF44MT
73, Stefan/DK7FC
PS: Will be quiet tonite due to VLF receive tests.
Am 14.03.2012 21:04, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
LF,
I'm somewhat confused. Can somone look at this link and tell me what
he sees: http://people.physics.anu.edu.au/~dxt103/grabber/
73, Stefan/DK7FC
|
