Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: DK7FC in VK?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC in VK?
From: ALAN MELIA <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:26:05 +0000 (GMT)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1331767565; bh=zaGdPj0LhVLVSnxMug6Jxj1dCw5ig3dUluRfFub9MQY=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yMXg06XNNC6Ivcd2dl7YkW+1AyyvpMvuXxFYotaoVHFNOs7fgL0g6qQr4BRKfJEwliGh2ZpfeffjDLmtqD+uzhDD62+udYcAMrtKigfgDj0hfIt7VNzl9At+dMScvEIItbFTG+xa+lU58D4J/SAZADNJK6v5pHFyFgEH1xWuWmo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BmUsM7yz49j+2UPYNxY2cgsYzHgFm0MNtkk0JtXsy1g4DT/mmf+FqT4pcySZgdv+k/gUAbaUkH8WkgM4uSPyjj8DL+oyaj6QF38q37Tt+oUspneVenlDLVrIo17Jvc0uJ422udcd+m70uV8hQTsFsqiEynY9bAuhrpgIrWJMuuY=;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Stefan that sounds spectacular! It is certainly not an easy path to conquor 
without some very clever modulation!

Well Done, this is not exactly a "good time" to try either.

Alan
G3NYK


--- On Wed, 14/3/12, Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
> Subject: LF: DK7FC in VK?
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: "Gamal Wahid Soegiono" <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, 14 March, 2012, 22:40
> LF,
> 
> Not yet a clear proof but probably i left a first trace in
> VK on 136.172 kHz in my evening transmission a few hours
> ago.
> 
> The VK1SV grabber ( http://people.physics.anu.edu.au/~dxt103/grabber/)
> showed this spectrogram at about 20:10 UTC: 
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/is%20that%20a%207.jpg
> 
> It looks pretty equal to a 7 i find.
> 
> Note the time delay of the time stamp in the spectrogram and
> in the text box in the left top corner. The correct time is
> that of the text box. (We don't know where this delay may
> come from). The delay is exactly 30 minutes.
> So that 7 must have been on air at about 19:15 UTC. This
> exactly matches with my own grabber capture which can be
> seen at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/EU60.jpg
> 
> Also the frequency matches as well as the DFCW element
> length and the DFCW shift of my DFCW-180 transmission. As a
> comparison i generated a 7 in a spectrogram with equal
> setting as used by Dimitris/VK1SV. Then i cut that 7 and
> inserted it into the VK grabber capture, see: 
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/7%20comparison.png
> 
> Of course we will go on trying in the next time and hope to
> get a even better proof. In that mode there is little room,
> i.e. time to receive a complete call. The time is very
> limited. But maybe we will see a F tomorrow :-)
> I'm very optimistic you know.
> 
> That is a path of 16464 km :-) 
> http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN49IK00WD&from=QF44MT
> 
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> 
> PS: Will be quiet tonite due to VLF receive tests.
> 
> Am 14.03.2012 21:04, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
> > LF,
> > 
> > I'm somewhat confused. Can somone look at this link and
> tell me what he sees: http://people.physics.anu.edu.au/~dxt103/grabber/
> > 
> > 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> 
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>