Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: RE: Progress using WOLF on VLF

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Progress using WOLF on VLF
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:00:45 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102CB0B68CCD76@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Wolf,

OK thanks for the answer.
Am 03.02.2012 17:45, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Hi Stefan,

Integrate WOLF in SpecLab - too much overkill. The program (SL) is, imo, already too overloaded with functions as it grew over the years.
OK i understand and agree.

Maybe, after everything inside SL uses GPS-based timestamps (like Paul Nicholson's VLF RX Tools), there will be a simple interface to feed the resampled audio stream (which would then have *exactly* 24000, 32000, or 48000 samples / second plus a timestamp for each sample with an accuracy in the microsecond range) towards other programs, using a TCP/IP based method, or a shared memory buffer (as in Paul's VLF RX Toolchain). THEN, after all that being finished, the WOLF GUI would be one of the first external applications which would make use of the system described above.
Interesting! I wish you good luck with your progress.


73, Stefan/DK7FC
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>