Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: RE: Progress using WOLF on VLF

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Progress using WOLF on VLF
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:48:53 +0100
In-reply-to: <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102CB0B68CCD76@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102CB0B68CCD76@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Rik,

I simply forgot the PA at my parents QTH and don't want to wait a week. Also it is overkill to use it for the LOPT. I think the LOPT will handle up to 100W RF. So i will build a separate PA (this evening) in class D mode (2x IRFZ48N) for a 12...20V design. More power, clear digital drive, no self oscillations but still some sidebands on VLF, which i think is uncritical.

73, Stefan

Am 02.02.2012 18:33, schrieb Rik Strobbe:
Hello Stefan,
 
great experiment.
Why not using the "big" bridge-PA and keeping bandwidth within reasonable limits by increasing the transition time (t- option) ?
 
73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>