John
Congrats on DF6NM reception!
Had already moved on to watching Stefan on 136172 by that time after not getting any likely 'lock
ons' close enough in frequency. Stefan's signal is still > 10 dB down from 'prime' propagation a few
weeks back. Reception of Markus's WOLF would probably have been much easier 'back then'.
Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Wolf 137.294
Markus,
In what must have been a cruel trick by the gods of propagation, your signal was sent to me,
bypassing the QTH's of W1VD and VE2IQ.
2012-02-01 03:46:40 >WOLF10 -r 8001.056 -f 800.518 -t 0.5 -d 24 -w 0.0000
t: 24 f: 0.195 a:-0.9 dp: 83.6 ci: 4 cj:200 F6JT8M1UR4I*/F ?
t: 48 f: 0.334 a: 1.1 dp: 89.3 ci:15 cj: 42 OQQEGQ0VLM1HBC/ ?
t: 96 f: 0.336 a: 0.9 dp: 88.0 ci: 5 cj:432 NXPW1Y.9K8WOT8N ?
snip...
t: 864 f:-0.078 pm:38.87 jm:461 q: -4.9 -7.6 E6SPZNVR3I.G0H ?
t: 960 f:-0.078 pm:47.17 jm:461 q: -4.5 -8.8 BNWV.AG/YG17PCM ?
t:1056 f:-0.078 pm:52.28 jm:461 q: -4.0 -8.8 73 DF6NM JN593 ?
t:1152 f:-0.078 pm:55.71 jm:461 q: -3.7 -9.3 Y6P.3IC/7H2DN7W ?
t:1248 f:-0.078 pm:56.51 jm:461 q: -3.5 -8.1 JTNBM8JRZNH.SG2 ?
t:1344 f:-0.078 pm:57.02 jm:461 q: -3.5 -5.7 73 DF6NM JN59NJ -
t:1440 f:-0.078 pm:59.84 jm:461 q: -3.0 -5.0 73 DF6NM JN59NJ -
t:1536 f:-0.078 pm:62.04 jm:461 q: -2.8 -4.8 73 DF6NM JN59NJ -
t:1632 f:-0.078 pm:66.65 jm:461 q: -2.4 -5.1 73 DF6NM JN59NJ -
t:1728 f:-0.078 pm:67.49 jm:461 q: -2.3 -5.7 73 DF6NM JN59NJ -
t:1824 f:-0.078 pm:68.50 jm:461 q: -2.2 -5.5 73 DF6NM JN59NJ -
t:1920 f: 0.166 pm:72.00 jm:635 q: -6.4 -8.0 JYJ21IJWVG7CCF ?
I'm betting that the peak was strong, but fairly brief, and the "flywheel effect" stretched it
out. I don't know what Stephan's signal was doing at the time.
Anyway, it worked!
John, W1TAG
FN42ch
|
