To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: OPERA - why it's less data than normal CW ? |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:55:51 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M9xt6qp9ku3Q2yy9oGvim86iEXSTwDRuVXK2bA8wKDI=; b=d063LJtEgVrsplr69EXBGrnSSMFErfevIPad++t7NfUHIfP3eoyIx0dcqQwax05MNX oYEfYTQdng4b5QZ41t5SW7kLmrMC12SgIZt+KGiu6kfMraYeXtd8Pw1azZRSwTPtw5+l o92KXC2TM6mP7suV2MPz+7QBvWKXsS9gusVQc= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <780955996.1040888.1325583040480.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb057> <CAA8k23TCT9qzrQykuWVa3AD0uOd_cPbd7XbKP7bXONWrpo=TYw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Until I deleted every last trace of the software after discovering it was sending IP packets, I had started analysing the Tx sequence to see if it made any sense For any given sub-mode, the Tx slots are all equal length, so allocate a 0 and1 to each Tx state. If you do an autocorrelation on the resulting sequence, (by XORing a delayed version of the pattern with itself) some interesting longer sequences show up - always an even number of 1's' and 0's' for example. It almost has a vague Manchester Coding feel to it. But all analysis is stopped and will permanently stay so until a version appears that will not send IP packets. It was much easier to 'crack' WSJT coding - just a case of reading the source code :-) 'jnt On 3 January 2012 17:42, Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/3/2012 10:36 AM, Andy Talbot wrote: > > If 'someone' would publish the innards of that mode, a simple Tx only > keyer could surely be developed, and te mode woue be useful > > And maybe somebody could even adventure in writing an Rx program... > but of course the protocol needs to be completely open source for this. > > 73 Alberto I2PHD > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: OPERA NEW VERSION - 3/2/2012 1726 Hrs z, Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: OPERA - why it's less data than normal CW ?, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: OPERA - why it's less data than normal CW ?, Alberto di Bene |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: OPERA - why it's less data than normal CW ?, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |