Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 500 opera V

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 500 opera V
From: qrss <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:24:44 +0000
In-reply-to: <6269AFC61EFB4E17A5884AF57C3DD948@AGB>
References: <007f01ccdeb1$cda0b1e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <6269AFC61EFB4E17A5884AF57C3DD948@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
So Mal

Can you see or hear my 12WPM Morse ident between my OPERA signals? I doubt it. I could put QRS3 between, that would be a good test. Say a cryptic message for decipher, one transmission and that is it, if Opera decodes and the QRS remains unread OPERA wins.

Eddie

On 29/01/2012 19:53, Graham wrote:

R Mal

Those  signals where  about  10 db over the  limit ,  so  will  show , OP16 ,  is about 6  dB lower  again. but  a decode  is a decode.. good  start.  

14:44 500 G3ZJO de G3KEV Op4 142 miles -22 dB in SCARBOROUGH

136  is  being  most  used  at the  moment   RA9CUA  is  monitoring 

Show all seen by RA9CUA
Last report: RN3AGC

G..


Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 6:14 PM
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: 500 opera V

MF
On 500 Khz so far signals decoded in Opera mode have been visible on the waterfall therefore had the mode been QRSS the result would have probably been better and quicker in QRS 3 - 10
The mode is however interesting and needs little operator intervention.
de mal/g3kev
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>