Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: PA0RDT whip

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: PA0RDT whip
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:14:38 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
May be noise implications with the larger voltage drop of a
conventional diode .. a foreword conducting diode is a noise source ...
so perhaps a reverse larger derive across the supply would be more
appropriate ?

From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 6:01 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: PA0RDT whip

Hi John, It just gives a lower voltage drop but the unit only takes about
60mAmax  I think. A Si would do the job.
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Rabson" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 5:51 PM
Subject: LF: PA0RDT whip


I see from the RSGB Handbook that there is a Schottky diode in series with
the +12 line.  Does it have to be a Schottky device?

John F5VLF

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>