To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:13:02 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1313536352; bh=ds00tJ9hAp/EDEdrRXMzxVcD/dDwl5TR0JAPUs2lW8w=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=TB4NqTm19rDDQnxEdChWR3oHQnLAdkuZVLcM2BtSTAwPmPUmnd2aSTWy1q1x9dDOXw/9I44dEODx4aRYzlLm/i9H4Ri0D5hMVG9GjR07UOmfFZOYLmIoNXM/doxwaQilIjLVFXS6s6zgS5pluryfonhDogbifnEtpwuLscMcAwI= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=6KCqSPultsKtojiCctHKG3oPfAyOmhL3iBFXh/Y0SbyHmmZm3Jb5sIG4t6vUZQWNZQFiyBjZjf1A3Ce1xRGt2YWbX9zukWmV0KLQFpTosTqQPMRGHnnih6eQvt0oxaz1WRSe0vCsVLTw+23xK1n9fmR3aOT2JIzRQ7Pwqe8fETA= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <68BE37BD69E54DEE89CEBA8E30E9B94E@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <3ED8E5422F1F45DBB8186E9D9870AD63@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <938BF599006244949F6CDDB5BA91F347@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <0A4ED65EC3B244A3BD0DAD6ACFF43793@JimPC> <[email protected]> <3746D901368F4C139E414F9110153EEE@JimPC> <[email protected]> <1B55B625C3CD4D529EC361D9C5D79D96@JimPC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Stefan, Looking good so far...A Q of 486 is certainly reaching the point where it becomes inconvenient - but remember that it is easy to reduce Q (probably connecting a preamp, putting it in a container, etc, will reduce Q a bit anyway), and that the higher Q is, the better the SNR. So I would test it as an antenna with a preamp - if there is more SNR than you need, you could experiment with some damping resistance. Cheers, Jim Moritz73 de M0BMU |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: PA0A (?) on rn3aus-grabber, Alex K |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |