To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:26:07 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <3746D901368F4C139E414F9110153EEE@JimPC> |
References: | <68BE37BD69E54DEE89CEBA8E30E9B94E@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <3ED8E5422F1F45DBB8186E9D9870AD63@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <938BF599006244949F6CDDB5BA91F347@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <0A4ED65EC3B244A3BD0DAD6ACFF43793@JimPC> <[email protected]> <3746D901368F4C139E414F9110153EEE@JimPC> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Jim, Am 16.08.2011 17:54, schrieb James Moritz: I did the measurement with a high-Z probe while the VFO was connected to the attenuator (50 Ohm type), using a BNC T-piece. The 20 mV is the peak level (thus mVp ;-) ) while the mentioned 100 uV is rms.I took an analog homemade VFO to generate a sine wave at 137 kHz, 20 mVp at 50 Ohm, measured with an oscilloscope. Then i added a 43 dB attenuator between RX (which has a 50 Ohm input) and VFO.So, assuming the oscilloscope also had a 50ohm input termination, the input to the receiver would be (20mV - 43dB) = 142uV, actually 3dB more than the 100uV figure you mention. 73, Stefan/DK7FC |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Ferrite Loops, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: ferrite coil, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas, James Moritz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |