To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: SPAM |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:02:05 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1308168415; bh=lNHR+hiRwbfGs81OpZZ06wPUPvW5SpBK+YBkZd59S6Q=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=R+Bk6TQI0DBX0akdsBPQ3UiWU94pcOUZs04OyRwc9Jc0DLMq6KWawXbJvuNk29sKXqj9q54EUUN8euZl4uuJkdX0BphK9UnVlL5NZtQWJBQOBdBtBKmPnb3FqJxL3GspZicsk7/6GXKasvaKM/83OL999wVBRAOh1Q7n5yXX1N0= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=gMjoP2u309rTcvWB28na9duSz1WLS/Wr8FX6XbI/V18X1zssc37lIE4iK7Rcbvw5VWIbDyUdqMXz7SDZEUUZpZUJaGsbNmZdFub34jKNs6SMEBEtt7QM65B39Ecam+0SZoloiIte3rMV0+ulOKDcf4r8PPpY+d2zS6WpUmvqxoU= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <005401cc2b83$0d0cbaf0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><CE046E63AFFD4FE7A4ABE899C46ADD12@AGB> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi on my look at the header it was 2 out of a max acceptable of 5. I think you will find a lot of the reason for this is that Alberto has posted in HTML and you will find that HTML posts do tend to have a higher hit rate that plain text. Also any clickable links seems to up the count as well. The Yahoo SpamGuard is generally quite good but quite erratic sometimes. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Lapthorn" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:46 PM Subject: Re: LF: SPAM > Mal has a genuine point and is not criticizing Alberto. > > Alberto's emails do seem to get treated as SPAM frequently by email > programmes, in my case by Gmail which is usually excellent at filtering > genuine SPAM. > > His contribution is not in question at all, just why his emails > automatically get routed as SPAM when they are clearly not. Does anyone know > why this might be as I am sure Mal and I are not alone with this problem? > > I don't have problems with any other emails sent to this group by others. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > > > On 15 June 2011 19:51, Graham <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Alberto has contributed a considerable amount of time and effort > > to the radio community ... > > > > I seem to remember a screaming fit when a real spam event took > > place some time ago > > > > the two seem to contradict > > > > *From:* mal hamilton <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 15, 2011 6:38 PM > > *To:* rsgb <[email protected]> > > *Subject:* LF: SPAM > > > > Recent msg fm Alberto scores a high count of SPAM points > > g3kev > > > > > > > > > > > -- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Scientists predict rare 'hibernation' of sunspots, Roger Lapthorn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Scientists predict rare 'hibernation' of sunspots, Alan Melia |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: SPAM, Roger Lapthorn |
Next by Thread: | LF: Zevs 15-06 tonight.jpg, henny van elst |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |