Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Fw: It's BACK !! http://websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8903/

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Fw: It's BACK !! http://websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8903/
From: Pieter-Tjerk de Boer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:29:14 +0200
In-reply-to: <4A36FB8CAE8F4DC7817B1546D4AA88BC@AGB>
Mail-followup-to: [email protected]
References: <23871D1350644645B4FB9745CF9DFB0E@AGB> <[email protected]> <4A36FB8CAE8F4DC7817B1546D4AA88BC@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 05:10:35PM +0100, Graham wrote:

> Q 1 one for  the  beacon chasers , could the  waterfall   time be slowed to 
> give  the  much  sought  after (usually by the  more vain east coast 
> station)  slow   CW  trace  , there  is a  almost  freeze  option , but 

The almost freeze option only slows the waterfall down, but does not
do extra integration as you'd presumably wish.

> what  about a   ''spec-lab  type''   up-date  time  box ? , not so much use 

What does that box do? (I'm not very familiar with spec-lab.)

> Q 2  How much  data  is  downloaded  if  say  I tune to  a  SSB  signal by 
> my  web-link  / what is the  minimum  B/W  required  for the  system to 
> function at the  most  basic  level ?

About 130 kbit/s or so.

73, Pieter-Tjerk, PA3FWM



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>