Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: test message

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: test message
From: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 22:26:03 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <28614F2FCAAF4E01B3FAA50212EE94FB@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10

Hi Eddie,

You wrote:
Did you ever put numbers to the data units?

080905.jpg is familiar to us as a breakfast or tea time 3 unit code, reading 6,11,12

0080906jpg is more complex 3,8,6 - 6,8 ---- 9,11,10 - 12,4

This has confirmed some as yet unused (unseen by me) data units which I had surmised were there and useable.

I didn't try to 'see' anything there, I am not even sure how many different 'tones' they actually send. But it doesn't seem that much, only a few bits per symbol.

The filenames use the date in ISO 8601 format, which I often use for temporary filenames.. YYMMDD . With a full year number, the dates were 2008-09-05 and 2008-09-06. Not sure if the timescale was in UTC or local time back then (but compare this with Markus' post, the schedule seems to be the same still). I don't remember what happened on September 6, 2008, why they sent so many 'data bits' around and after noon. It's a pity my recording ends before the transmitter switched back to the 82 Hz idle tone on that day.

73,
  Wolf .



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>