Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz

["mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>]

Yes if we all use CW,  it is more effective and some expertise is required. WSPR is an Appliance Operator mode that does not always decode whereas CW or QRS can easily be read  directly by EAR or seen by the EYE.

G3KEV

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Albert

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:21 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz

Thanks Stefan,

 

Are you not active in WSPR ? It would be more effective if we all use the same modes. (at least on specific days) I like WSPR because you can clearly and easily see the change of signal strenght over a longer time at a number of stations. Also QSO's are possible using WSJT7 in the WSPR mode. Using CMSK is an other possibility to QSO at low signal levels.

 

73, Albert

 

     

----- Original Message -----

From: Stefan Schäfer

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:41 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz

Hello Albert,

Your WSPR signal in 976 mHz, received in my wideband window at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html

Noisy evening here, many lightnings...

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 27.04.2011 18:52, schrieb Albert:

All,

 

2nite WSPR TX on 137.5 kHz (dial 136) tx fraction 30%

 

73, Albert PA0A