Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: QRP

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: QRP
From: Laurence KL7UK <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:23:41 -0800
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <C43F490F1E9B4392ACB5AF8E831429D1@White>
References: <001001cc05c9$a2882ae0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>,<C43F490F1E9B4392ACB5AF8E831429D1@White>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Or a wideband view of what you can see at VLF... :-) ......
 

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:10:03 +0200
Subject: Re: LF: QRP

Righto Mal - so when will we finally see a decent 9 kHz signal from that famous Scarborough antenna?
 
73, Markus (DF6NM)

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:28 PM
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: QRP

Why do some insist on flogging QRP on the LF bands. The object should be to generate a signal that all can hear or see.
QRO is more appropriate on the lower frequencies otherwise the RX operator has a hard time digging the signal out of the noise.
The TX operator puts no effort into the exercise. QRP and Earth mode equally disaster for those making an effort to detect signals on LF.
I leave gas pipe and electic wire underground propagation to the local gas/el installer and do not believe all you see on twitter and tweet
by others.
G3KEV
 
 
=
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>