|
Markus
I have made it quite clear that presently I am not
interested in Transmitting on 9 khz and if I did you would certainly hear me.
I am told that I have the strongest signal on 137 and 500
khz from EU and the same would apply if I could be bothered to TX on 9
khz.
Some years ago there was over 30 countries active on 137
CW and now it is down to just a few, 500 khz is likewise not worth the effort
anymore and 9 khz is not worth the effort as far as I am concerned.
73 de mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:10
PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRP
Righto Mal - so when will we finally see a decent
9 kHz signal from that famous Scarborough antenna?
73, Markus (DF6NM)
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:28 PM
Subject: LF: QRP
Why do some insist on flogging QRP on the LF bands. The
object should be to generate a signal that all can hear or see.
QRO is more appropriate on the lower frequencies
otherwise the RX operator has a hard time digging the signal out of the
noise.
The TX operator puts no effort into the exercise. QRP
and Earth mode equally disaster for those making an effort to detect signals
on LF.
I leave gas pipe and electic wire underground
propagation to the local gas/el installer and do not believe all you see on
twitter and tweet
by others.
G3KEV
| 