To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: VLF Transmissions - G3XIZ - 12th / 13th February |
From: | Chris Osborn <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:19:06 +0000 (GMT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1297408746; bh=KjvNfQskVEQ/rJnZrHH/HPap6m5Lw3wiu2f0TbQC358=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FVAQ6paR/hv0/GOjZIwvWxXNGRjvQ/RMtqGlWUvth0lzIjDwOXBgPzvmURfNTFiuKjYebg5w0IUKcc3BBiF6PLzPb0HIiaT/y6YlNv1SP49LWN5u4dC8BEKhKCIbXW/CEAf7Qnv2VyVUULu65RiupFRYO7kFBVhiV/RQMoJ1ESs= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JsZuihKWuzles24HNvPxb/ffAJ603R9O1FZQTv9KonxDvxyR+I0k27JkM8BECIx2s6G67pWPrOWFCoznnN3k0k3q35eoB6bzxbchTZY64zHqLvKU6N5+yQJBh6XKbB70y/vXEUr4tP/Bjo33p0EZhlqker4cIbxuGMLI7RfN5cY=; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <C65499AFECF7451E816377CEE21026A9@White> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <00c401cbc94c$79b4ca60$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1404B701DF084CA18C996DD5F5F07952@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <C65499AFECF7451E816377CEE21026A9@White> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Roger, Jim, Marcus, LF I shall try to stabilize the shack temperature and keep frequency drift to a minimum. The new TX uses a 10.000 MHz oscillator followed by a G4JNT divider (RadCom Sept 2010) Thus I can transmit frequencies of 10.000 MHZ divided by even numbers e.g. 1112, 1114, 1116 . . . I intend to build an off-air standard, 10 MHz output and locked to Droitwich (198 kHz) but the PLL IC's have taken weeks to arrive (from Korea via E-Bay). My TX OCXO is an ex-equipment unit (from China via E-Bay) PIEZO, Carlisle, PA. Mod 29201326 10.000 MHZ I must confess that I'd assumed that the frequency stability with changing ambient temperatures would be better than it seems to be. 73 Chris G3XIZ From: Markus Vester <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, 10 February, 2011 21:32:25 Subject: Re: LF: VLF Transmissions - G3XIZ - 12th / 13th February Hi Chris, what sort of 10 MHz OCXO do you have? The
little canned industrial types (eg. http://www.kvg-gmbh.de/10.0.html?&L=3 )
will stay within about a couple of ppb
over hours, translating to some 10
microHz at VLF.
Best 73, Markus (DF6NM)
From: Roger Lapthorn
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: LF: VLF Transmissions - G3XIZ - 12th / 13th
February The stability of "within a few mHz" could be a problem for those of us
using extremely narrow Spectrum Lab settings to dig your signal out if the noise
Chris. This is where absolute locking to a GPS source is so valuable as one can
screw the bandwidth right down. A few mHz could mean the carrier drifts and is
not detected. Still, I'll be looking!
73s
Roger G3XBM
... |
Previous by Date: | LF: XDV in CT, jrusgrove |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: HE3OM on 137.3 this weekend, HB9ASB |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF Transmissions - G3XIZ - 12th / 13th February, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF Transmissions - G3XIZ - 12th / 13th February, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |