----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 07,
2011 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re:
OE5ODL over different paths
Mal,
your report for Ossi is
certainly acknowledged, and the fact that your good receive
conditions often allow you to see a signal in a
relatively wide FFT bandwidth was indeed noted.
In the context of my recent
posting, it was not my intention to list or qualify
reception reports or DX achievements. In order to visualise
patterns of fieldstrength variation over of the day, I was
looking for continuous multi-hour traces on the available
grabbers.
And yes, an additional data set
for your distance would be valuable indeed. For this, you
could either run SpecLab slowly, or perhaps use it's plotter
function to create a graph or list of signal level versus
time.
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 7:22 PM
Subject: LF: Re: OE5ODL over different paths
Markus
You forgot my reception report at 1191
km as confirmed by Stefan.
I was able to copy all day at a speed as
fast as QRS3.The signal for most of the day morning and
afternoon was fairly steady.
The signal was strong enough for a QSO
at QRS 3 or QRS10
Please get the statistics correct,
leaving out the 1191 km distance distorts the facts.
g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February
07, 2011 5:49 PM
Subject: VLF: OE5ODL
over different paths
Today's long carrier from
OE5ODL provides another nice illustration of the diurnal
modal interference patterns.
The receivers at about 200 km
see a minimum before and around local noon
However at about 400 km, a
maximum occurs at the same time
Renato's line at about 600 km
looks somewhat flatter,
but apparently receiver gain had been stepped up at 12:45.
At nearly 2800 km,
again sees a rather flat
inimum from about 10 to 12 UT.
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
