|
Mal,
your report for Ossi is certainly acknowledged, and
the fact that your good receive conditions often allow you to see a
signal in a relatively wide FFT bandwidth was indeed
noted.
In the context of my recent posting, it was not my
intention to list or qualify reception reports or DX achievements. In order to
visualise patterns of fieldstrength variation over of the day, I was
looking for continuous multi-hour traces on the available
grabbers.
And yes, an additional data set for your distance
would be valuable indeed. For this, you could either run SpecLab slowly, or
perhaps use it's plotter function to create a graph or list of signal
level versus time.
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 7:22 PM
Subject: LF: Re: OE5ODL over different paths
Markus
You forgot my reception report at 1191 km as
confirmed by Stefan.
I was able to copy all day at a speed as fast as QRS3.The
signal for most of the day morning and afternoon was fairly steady.
The signal was strong enough for a QSO at QRS 3 or
QRS10
Please get the statistics correct, leaving out the 1191 km
distance distorts the facts.
g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 5:49
PM
Subject: VLF: OE5ODL over different
paths
Today's long carrier from OE5ODL provides
another nice illustration of the diurnal modal interference
patterns.
The receivers at about 200 km see a minimum
before and around local noon
However at about 400 km, a maximum
occurs at the same time
Renato's line at about 600 km
looks somewhat flatter, but apparently
receiver gain had been stepped up at 12:45.
At nearly 2800 km,
again sees a rather flat inimum from about
10 to 12 UT.
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
| 
