Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: JA GRRABBERS at a same time |
| From: | John GM4SLV <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:47:42 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <001f01cbae5c$01cc94c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
| References: | <002801cbadf3$1e15bb70$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <1294359648.6336.6.camel@vaio3rd> <001501cbae53$54fee2a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <001f01cbae5c$01cc94c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:14:09 -0000 "mal hamilton" <[email protected]> wrote: > Tony > In the electronic context. > There are CYCLES, KILOCYCLES and MEGACYCLES all related to FREQUENCY > of OCCURENCE No they aren't. They are related simply to NUMBER of OCCURRENCE. The quantification of "FREQUENCY of OCCURRENCE" requires a time reference during which the given "NUMBER of OCCURRENCES" happen. Which, of course, you neglect to give. CYCLES per Fortnight/week/day/hour/....? If you are going to use archaic units, then at least be accurate, scientific and unambiguous about it. But then again, scientific rigour has never been your strong point, has it. John GM4SLV |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: JA GRRABBERS at a same time, Johan H. Bodin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: JA GRRABBERS at a same time, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: JA GRRABBERS at a same time, g4gvw |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: JA GRRABBERS at a same time, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |