----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 5:28
PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRS SPEED
Mal
What do you know... Answer, nothing useful to this
discussion.
You have no experience using long dot lengths or paths
outside the small confines of EU on LF where it's easy to preach your BS as it
only works because of the density of stations...
Also your preaching
about much power and huge vertical antennas is not relevant. Once you
reach a certain point say the 1W ERP limit we are all equal. So the only
multipliers left is integration and operator practice using long integration
technologies.
Alas, this is what burns you up as you have no skill in
these areas and when you try you end up working the neighbour's toaster oven
as your comical attempt to copy Stefan on 9KHz demonstrated...
It's too
bad you're the type of dog that can't be taught new tricks...
So
rather than waste BW on the reflector spend some time TRYING to work some real
DX at say the 12000km or 7100km range and then post some meaningful
comments. You'll find that your worn bag of tricks won't work.
73
Scott
On 12/1/2010 3:14 PM, mal hamilton
wrote:
LF/MF
Like I have said many times before. QRS speeds
of 3 or 10 are usually sufficient and maybe 30 in extreme cases but speeds
of 120, 240 and slower are not useful because of QSB and QRM hits breaking
up the trace and producing misleading results.
in fact even faster CW is useful for an ID
under poor or bad fading conditions.
Use as much power as possible and a good
elevated antenna to overcome path fading and qrm. QRP signals are
vy prone to QSB whereas the QRO signals make it to DX
destinations.
Grabbers running at vy slow speeds are not
useful
de mal/g3kev