Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: VLF - distances achjeved

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF - distances achjeved
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:32:14 -0000
References: <[email protected]> <004301cb9c7b$1ee6e530$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
John
I keep seeing messages here on the reflector making corrections and talking about BUGS and more Bugs. There should be no bugs it should be correct in the first instance
Evidence is what I like not hearsay
Like I said some persons would believe anything
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF - distances achjeved

Mal,

I am using data supplied by Stefan, Gerhard and others.  I have no reason to doubt them.

John

On 15 Dec 2010, at 18:11CET, mal hamilton wrote:

Published articles need hard facts and some people would believe anything they read. It is like newspapers often the facts are distorted to make a good story and it is hard to tell FACTS from FICTION

I am well aware of that, having at one time edited CREGJ.  Articles were subjected to peer review and I don't suppose things have changed.
J..
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>