Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: VLF - distances achjeved

from [John Rabson] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF - distances achjeved
From: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:51:36 +0100
In-reply-to: <004301cb9c7b$1ee6e530$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <[email protected]> <004301cb9c7b$1ee6e530$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Mal,

I am using data supplied by Stefan, Gerhard and others.  I have no reason to doubt them.

John

On 15 Dec 2010, at 18:11CET, mal hamilton wrote:

Published articles need hard facts and some people would believe anything they read. It is like newspapers often the facts are distorted to make a good story and it is hard to tell FACTS from FICTION

I am well aware of that, having at one time edited CREGJ.  Articles were subjected to peer review and I don't suppose things have changed.
J..
=
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Re: VLF - distances achjeved, Roger Lapthorn
Next by Date:  Re: LF: LF/MF ACTY, Alberto di Bene
Previous by Thread:  LF: Re: Rules of the Sand Box!, George Vastianos
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: VLF - distances achjeved, mal hamilton
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]