LF: Re: Rules of the Sand Box!

["George Vastianos" <george@vastianos.com>]

good shot...Scott... 100% on target!

 

73

sv8gxc

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Scott Tilley

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 9:31 PM

Subject: LF: Rules of the Sand Box!

The only reports I've seen on the reflector that I suspect are those from you Mal.

I've never seen evidence from you other than that you lack modern operating skills and generate a lot of hyperbole.

You operate a station that is out of the dark ages without accurate frequency calibration, relying on technology and skills of the 1940s and the inability to employ modern integration techniques.

Yet you feel you have a 'right' to use the reflector to defame respected members of our hobby and challenge their honour. 

Somehow you have become deluded to believe you are the arbiter of what is valid amateur radio.

You're not, you're a grumpy old man, with no other outlet in life by the look of it, and I suggest you reflect on that before WE insist that you be removed from the dialog here.

Again, I ask you to 'play nice' in the sand box.

The rules are simple(for most of us!):

• Share your toys
• Play Fair
• Don't hit people
• Put things back where you found them
• Clean up your own mess
• Say you're sorry when you hurt somebody
• Don't tell lies
• Live a balanced life

73 Scott
VE7TIL






 

On 12/15/2010 6:43 PM, mal hamilton wrote:

Are you referring to the msg sent earlier on from Stefan stating there was another BUG

Are you saying this is Rubbish or what do you mean please explain, I was only quoting an email that I read and advising John to be careful.

 

g3kev

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Roger Lapthorn

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 5:47 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF - distances achjeved

Rubbish 

Sent from my iPod Touch 4g

On 15 Dec 2010, at 17:11, "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:

John

Be careful what you publish for accuracy, there are conflicting reports about what takes place on VLF/LF/MF - lots of inaccuracies.

ie carriers seen but no ID then the questions on the reflector,  was that you if not who was it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I saw an X then a Y who was that? Too much guesswork and no positive ID

Published articles need hard facts and some people would believe anything they read. It is like newspapers often the facts are distorted to make a good story and it is hard to tell FACTS from FICTION

 

G3KEV

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: John Rabson

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:55 AM

Subject: LF: VLF - distances achjeved

I am writing a piece on VLF for the Cave Radio & Electronics Group Journal and would like to include distance records.  Can people please confirm that the following information is correct (or not)?

Above-ground antennas

Hz	ERP mW	From	To	km
8970	58	Heidelberg	Israel	2873
6470	9	Heidelberg	Breclav	904
5170	5	Heidelberg	Breclav	904

Earth current antennas

Hz	TX power W	Electrode spacing m	From	To	km
8970	250	600	Heidelberg	Roschbach	72
6470	250	600	Heidelberg	Roschbach	72
5170	250	600	Heidelberg	Roschbach	72

Thank you.

John F5VLF