Jacek
Tnx for your suggestion but I prefer CW or maybe QRS3 anything else is too
slow for me.
If someone can generate a few watts erp for me to make a QSO then I could
get interested but not QRS 600000000000000000000 and a lot of guesswork.
de mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacek Lipkowski" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: Re: Detections of 5 microwatt transmission
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, mal hamilton wrote:
>
> > This looks like a lot of trouble for no real practical purpose, other
than
> > maybe get a glimpse of a carrier an odd time on 8970 Kcs
> > The possibility of a real time QSO on this band over any distance looks
> > remote. In all it seems a lot of effort for little reward.
>
> Mal, take a look at Stefan's signal at 904km:
> http://www.lipkowski.org/~sq5bpf/dk7fc_20101002/
> the shorter lower frequency dash is abt 720s long, a 120s dash would still
> be detactable.
>
> so DFCW120 is practical at 904km distance. DFCW 120 is considered a
> practical QSO mode by many.
>
> btw Mal, maybe you should try your luck in transmitting with your big
> antennas. get a stable frequency generator, put up a carrier, and give us
> a chance. you might be surprised at the results.
>
> VY 73
>
> Jacek / SQ5BPF
>
|
