To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: QRN |
From: | Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:13:56 +0100 (CET) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Stefan Schäfer wrote: Do you mean LF and VLF can be compared in that situation? I remember Scott/VE7TIL has reported that LF was totally down before some weeks but he received the EU MSKs very well anyway. this was just an observation. lf and vlf are close enough, but i'm not a propagation expert PS: Will your daughter be QRV on LF in CW some day? Please can i get a sked? :-) maybe, she knows about 2/3 of the alphabet in cw already. ask me again in 12 years :) jacek |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: 19.2 and 12.09 kHz, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: PAT 499.7 Feld-Hell and CW, Gary - G4WGT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: QRN, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: QRN, Alan Melia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |