Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: QRN

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: VLF: QRN
From: Stefan Schäfer <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:02:17 +0100
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010311121180.7134@paranoid.lipkowski.org>
References: <4CCD3F0B.7040902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010311121180.7134@paranoid.lipkowski.org>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
Oh yes, indeed. I just saw that GBZ is much weaker in the moment on my 
wideband window, also DHO38 but not so JXN and all the 3 Alphas (which 
are stronger than in the last 13 hours)! The MSKs traces are well suited 
to differenciate between low QRN and a bad propagation.
Am 31.10.2010 11:26, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski:
there seems to be increased absorption right now, maybe due to solar 
x-rays. i've just tried to show my daughter how a crystal radio works, 
and can barely receive Warsaw 1 on 225kHz (with active antenna and 
tuned circut).
Do you mean LF and VLF can be compared in that situation? I remember 
Scott/VE7TIL has reported that LF was totally down before some weeks but 
he received the EU MSKs very well anyway.
73, Stefan

PS: Will your daughter be QRV on LF in CW some day? Please can i get a sked? :-)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>