Thanks for the link Stefan.
DCF39 made a brief appearance at sunset here. For the first time
this side of summer it pushed the DCF39 plot on my website up about
10dB over the noise.
Last winter DCF39 was audible for hours at a time here!
73 Scott
On 9/9/2010 7:41 AM, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
Hello Scott,
With some imagination one can see a trace on my LD_DX grabber in
the
QRSS-120 window
(http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html)
arround 4 UTC at 137.778 kHz (still visible there). If the QRN
would be
3 dB lower or propagation or your signal would be 3 dB better, it
would
be rather clear if it's your trace. I hope for the winther and
some
improvements on my side ;-)
73, GL, Stefan
Am 09.09.2010 04:06, schrieb Scott Tilley:
Thanks Warren
Oppps! So use to living in the milli world!
Scott
On 9/9/2010 1:11 AM, Warren Ziegler wrote:
Scott,
Surely you mean a conservative 0.5 W rather than 0.5
mW !
--
73 Warren K2ORS
WD2XGJ
WD2XSH/23
WE2XEB/2
WE2XGR/1
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:47 PM,
Scott
Tilley <[email protected]>
wrote:
I'm going to bump up the juice from 400W to 1.1KW
(MOALFA Stun mode)
tonight. +4dB.
137778.0 +0.25Hz DAH, DFCW120, my sunset to sunrise.
According to the my most conservative calculations that
will be about
0.5mW ERP
I may revert back to 400W if I have any sign of trouble.
73 Scott
VE7TIL CN89dk
http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/
|
|
