Hello Scott,
With some imagination one can see a trace on my LD_DX grabber in the
QRSS-120 window
(http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html)
arround 4 UTC at 137.778 kHz (still visible there). If the QRN would be
3 dB lower or propagation or your signal would be 3 dB better, it would
be rather clear if it's your trace. I hope for the winther and some
improvements on my side ;-)
73, GL, Stefan
Am 09.09.2010 04:06, schrieb Scott Tilley:
Thanks Warren
Oppps! So use to living in the milli world!
Scott
On 9/9/2010 1:11 AM, Warren Ziegler wrote:
Scott,
Surely you mean a conservative 0.5 W rather than 0.5 mW !
--
73 Warren K2ORS
WD2XGJ
WD2XSH/23
WE2XEB/2
WE2XGR/1
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Scott
Tilley <[email protected]>
wrote:
I'm going to bump up the juice from 400W to 1.1KW (MOALFA Stun mode)
tonight. +4dB.
137778.0 +0.25Hz DAH, DFCW120, my sunset to sunrise.
According to the my most conservative calculations that will be about
0.5mW ERP
I may revert back to 400W if I have any sign of trouble.
73 Scott
VE7TIL CN89dk
http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/
|
|
