Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress

from [John Rabson] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress
From: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 08:42:17 +0200
In-reply-to: <000b01cb02a1$77e99ca0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <[email protected]> <000b01cb02a1$77e99ca0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
On 3 Jun 2010, at 00:18CEST, mal hamilton wrote:

Roger

Some say a NOV is not necessary on this QRG.

It depends on the country.  The last time I asked, the Crown monopoly on UK radiocommunications (which is modified by granting licences) did apply to this part of the spectrum.  Other adminstrations may have different laws.

John F5VLF 
=
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress, M0FMT
Next by Date:  RE: LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress, Rik Strobbe
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress, M0FMT
Next by Thread:  RE: LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress, Rik Strobbe
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]