| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress |
| From: | "Mike.WE0H" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:58:04 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <000b01cb02a1$77e99ca0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) |
In the US the bands are a free for all... I mean 9kc and below is free for all...The other bands above that, people are supposed to have a license & follow rules... Mike WE0H John R wrote: On 3 Jun 2010, mal h wrote:RogerSome say a NOV is not necessary on this QRG.It depends on the country. The last time I asked, the Crown monopoly on UK radiocommunications (which is modified by granting licences) did apply to this part of the spectrum. Other adminstrations may have different laws.John F5VLF |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Alpha back, Clemens Paul |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: VLF: Alpha back, Markus Vester |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress, Roger Lapthorn |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |