To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress |
From: | Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 3 Jun 2010 08:55:40 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XTRb7VEKSIEdVQa910gMmZkPcj7QOkJGcmrfQ16/gpc=; b=VQaDijCnCvSmvk5H8qvinqBSn5wtjQo+aQeqrodQtYm56OX5oi+OBMOgroQfpIhSAI 2blqN8nBTHiVOVh8qdf+6iegSpp2gztmNeE+MJkPjecnJUnqVkEDeGXljaxGYtS7fLd3 L2c2TOaGcssaZXOXC5hBsQcYOrjfYmC+iX9Qg= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TsSUdBE9Rh0Zi8MdMwHfMhm6dAOuTVMn1j5aweVQZQb4wqVdECjj1OHFit7O58nyen xLMN94D/Y5+UiElwWQVWeN/sqWsBClqVKcepq4X0SEHmHEKCjYaQGbtDljcRMWnVD0bN 39DzoTj2ObZizJ/Uyj4NusLgL0XGiCeyWtFGM= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C5106464F30@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> |
References: | <[email protected]> <000b01cb02a1$77e99ca0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C5106464F30@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
It does not surprise me that the OFCOM and the Met Office have taken almost 3 months to make no decision yet on NoVs for sub-kHz, but I was doing "the right thing" by applying for one. A reasonable response would have been to give permission to go-ahead on a "non-interference to other users" basis for a fixed period and possibly with a limit on power to the "antenna". In the absence of hearing any news I've gone ahead with occasional earth-mode transmissions at 1, 5 and 8.97kHz using just 4W on the reasonable assumption that radiated power is likely to be in the pW region and the risks to other users almost non-existant. Were I to run hundreds of watts to a larger antenna structure then it seems reasonable to wait for the NoV. Even then, as Stefan has shown, it requires a LOT of effort to get even a couple of mW of radiated power and the true risk of interference to other users must still be tiny. 73s Roger G3XBM On 3 June 2010 08:11, Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> wrote:
-- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress, Rik Strobbe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Alpha back, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Sub-9kHz NoV progress, Mike.WE0H |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |