Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: LF: 500 Permit emission’s bandwidth? EU and Global ??

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Re: LF: 500 Permit emission’s bandwidth? EU and Global ??
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 19:20:07 +0100
References: <DB8B3073C216478DBD30E4276D9F5794@AGB> <6C0A9ACBA77A40D6A17362F114DC0A7D@AGB> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C3E8DF194F1@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <003701caed43$95e00a00$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Roger
160 metres is vy similar to 600metres, why not use 160 where there is plenty of space. Why are the appliance operators and their data swamping the 3 khz on 600.
What is the logic?
mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 7:05 PM
Subject: LF: Re: LF: 500 Permit emission’s bandwidth? EU and Global ??

Mal,

Most would agree there is no place for data modes that take up lots of bandwidth, but 500kHz is an ideal band to experiment with narrow band data modes and some of the work being undertaken is very far removed from appliance operation.

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 6 May 2010 18:43, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
The majority of CW operators on LF/FMF will not exceed 100 hz bandwidth. 99.9% are sending at speeds of about 10wpm or less.
100 hz is about right on LF/MF where the total bandwidth of the permitted allocation is about 3 khz
also, as far as data modes are concerned all that is happening on LF/MF is bodging data modes meant for vhf/uhf applications and making a mess, ie the Appliance Operator approach
 
 
g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: LF: 500 Permit emission’s bandwidth? EU and Global ??

Graham,
 
the document that gives us access to 500kHz says 100Hz bandwidth, but does not say how many dB's the signal has to be attenuated at these limits.
 
73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
 

Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Graham [[email protected]]
Verzonden: donderdag 6 mei 2010 13:30
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: LF: 500 Permit emission’s bandwidth? EU and Global ??

Ok Many  thanks'  for the  reply's
 
From that .... next is :-
 
From the  data, I assume that  100  Hz is the  common  limiting factor for a  narrow  band  data transmission  that  could be used by all  who 'wanted'  to  use it  ?..(noted on the  cw keying  speed  ~ BW)
 
So if a  value of  100 Hz is  specified, what  is the  'presumed'  roll-off of the power in the said bands ?, assuming that  the  original  concept was based on CW operation , which by  definition 'has to' generate sidebands , there must be an assumed  tolerance ?
 
Q  would the deployment  of a  system that  could   defined as   125 hz bandwidth  ie 100 Hz with   +/-  12.5 Hz  overspill , cause  a  technical  breach  of the  regulations  or  be  viewed as  occupying  the  'allocated' bandwidth  for a  telegraphy transmission ? ,
 
Taking that  spectral measurements in the  10  Hz  region are  perhaps  starting to  test  even the  best equipment, the  area  is perhaps a  little  empiric ?
 
I use the  word  telegraphy, purposely to view/observe the  situation interims of the  licence  conditions and not on the  basis  of  'mode' which like  Liverpool  and Everton have there  own sub cultures  but are still  football  teams ..
 
Thanks 
 
Graham
G0NBD
 
 
 
 

From: Graham
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 10:39 PM
Subject: LF: 500 Permit emission’s bandwidth? EU and Global ??

500 Permit emission’s bandwidth?

 

Can any one indicated  what is the  permitted  ‘telegraphy’  bandwidth  of the various ‘new’ 500KHz  licences  or  special  permits issued round the  EU and now the  rest of the  Globe ?

 

I have the impression that 100 Hz is the maximum ‘telegraphy’ transmission bandwidth, in some cases, eg , Belgium at 100 Hz .  Others appear to be some what wider or not defined ?.

 

Norway  is CW only  ? what is the  Dutch  allocation ? Southern Ireland ? ... etc

 

Are  Beacons defined by  mode or  bandwidth  ?

 

Tnx – Graham

G0NBD

 

(I use the  word  ‘telegraphy’ as defined by the  ITU R V.662-3 ,  please no  reference to key clicks ! )








--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>