Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: ROS 503.600kHz beacon

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: ROS 503.600kHz beacon
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 20:44:14 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aZHbZ7IQbntF/0wQ0apmXzNDA1lBB284kYs3UZBIhpo=; b=uZXVhdj5ja4DhZRiu2fmtuCFkvd/ZcFbNAzqdiSZWw5i1QCmp0bu2Y6z9O/9rm8ByI OvYTvLkakLovxGkGcoVOpDZJPLJCr1Kx93BW7Z+Orcl/+ovy2aHj/Ku/dzuMOoE69QZ6 +TF37v7L8GTvNVCso54Q7K6OJvoi55CbYm3fY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bCNgMLFI8DdlCxvZy99cNNo/TLLIaLRPNQ6wdmMGWMzJwEgG6O1iHgymwjeTJnce3y 1+YFrt4fNPh/OSwM7HN8Iqe/wjVhMTr7DTuzbOZjoKAGBXJSpIEEDv+hzZN8FP5qn8eB 75/PIT9hyCXwmjsZxloipz3YhjDQOGTPRM8HE=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <000401cae9e5$cd22c130$0402a8c0@laptopcore2> <[email protected]> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C19A2156EA4@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <002f01caea22$0cc97f40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
How is any mode 'illegal' - apart from in the US where their national organisation seems to have self regulated thenselves to extremes.
 
ROS is not a "Secret Code or Cipher", its decodable by off-the shelf software without having to enter any secret password.
 
If teh author chooses to not publish the details, that just opens up bad feeling, and a desire to hack it.  Come on any GCHQ/NSA type people out there.    It can't be too difficult to reverse engineer with your techniques.:-)
 
On 2 May 2010 20:33, Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 2 May 2010, mal hamilton wrote:

That applies to most EU countries and the UK. This mode is illegal and a good way to terminate a licence.
Those using it are at RISK.

exactly my thoughts. if everyone rejected this mode on grounds that this is illegal, the author would be forced to either publish the specs, or to loose testing of his software by hams.

actually maybe this is the authors plot - let hams test the software for a while, and then sell it to some commercial customer (probably not military, but mine communications perhaps?)

VY 73

Jacek / SQ5BPF



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>