Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

VLF: Clipping or blanking??

To: [email protected]
Subject: VLF: Clipping or blanking??
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 15:05:29 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <008f01caf784$779a11d0$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Dear VLF,

In Spectrum Lab there are different methods for noise reduction (e.g. of lightnings). Those were discussed here in the last weeks. While Jim/M0BMU preferes the clipper (using 0 dB above AVG if i remember correctly), Markus/DF6NM prefers the noise blanker. Since i do a lot of experiments with the second grabber page, checking the optimal software and hardware for this antenna/location/band/mode..., i have now added a 7th window that shows the DFCW-600 window with a noise blanker instead of the clipper (i am also using the clipper so far). So there are 7 windows running now on this site: http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html

1: DFCW-600 with clipper (3dB above AVG)
2: DFCW-600 with noise blanker (ramp 0,002s, trigger 9dB, pulse 0,05s)
3: DFCW-60 (all others with the clipper as well)
4: DFCW-3
5: ALPHA (RSDN-20, F1) in 424µHz (currently OFF)
6: DFCW-6000
7: wide band window 0...24 kHz

I still have to reduce the IM in the first stage (2nd order low pass filter at the output of the first stage does not better the situation), either by reducing the wire length or adding a series resistor or...hm, will see (any ideas?). When the IM is reduced, i want agn to transmit DFCW-600 out of 1,1 km using the TV transformer. Then, one will see which noise reduction method makes the best readability :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>