Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLF: Clipping or blanking?? |
| From: | pws <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 May 2010 18:32:00 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <008f01caf784$779a11d0$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) |
Stefan, You wrote: > ... > Ok, but it could be a IM with another signal?! No, unlikely, since it appears where a mirrored signal of DHO38 should appear at a sample rate of 44 kHz. I don't think that's accidentally. > Because i know that the > sample rate is 48000 May be there's a re-sampling process elsewhere in your software. > and it is successfully locked to GBZ. How to lock the sample rate of a sound card against a MSK modulated signal? The only idea I have is to demodulate it and locking a re-sampling process against one of the two carriers - by software. May be there's the key. Beste Gruesse aus Kiel, Peter, df3lp |
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: Clipping or blanking??, Stefan Schäfer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: VLF: Clipping or blanking??, Roelof Bakker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: Clipping or blanking??, Stefan Schäfer |
| Next by Thread: | AW: VLF: Clipping or blanking??, Stefan Schäfer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |