Re: AW: LF: Re: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission

["Mike.WE0H" <we0h@gmx.com>]

Lets say DX will be a reception from Mal. He is quite a long distance 
from DK land.
Have you tried regular CW and had people listen for the CW?

Mike
WE0H



Stefan Schäfer wrote:
> Paul, the TX power was up to 300W and the current arround 530...570 mA, so an 
> optimal ERP of abt 2mW. The wind was strong and the kite at a high angle for 
> the most time!
>  
> Jim, M0BMU is the 2nd best DX distance! Jim, can you describe you RX detailed, pse. Or have i forgotten an older mail? What was the new /p QTH? And what are your observations about the change of QRM?
>  
> BTW: We could philosophize what is the definition for "DX" on LF and VLF! Or is there a standard definition? In my ham licence i learned that on HF, DX is outside the own continent and on VHF it is above 300km. So, what is it for LF? And what for VLF (by hams)? 
> When we think about the effort and the average antenna systems available we could call "DX" on VLF all that is beyond the near field, or say 10km, that it sounds not too much unusual? What do you (all) think?
>  
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC