To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Induction DX? |
From: | Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:34:41 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Fbl1kkcO5fpvpNTatZCVP+bXXA98hNaFVgd8PgSk4D8=; b=vBA84jmF/siDN1YP4CNgIUX64wlXfsYqYQCfO9OFHOiFRPjjfj0bEl2mvA/g//OgAc lzJyrsQxVhdTOWg/BMXl5Ls7OB6iFHaRn0Toxz0W9Jv2nQ7Cujf0ZJMR9XBBpEa6XQ4F IC0r8pkAF1tpzs/IDBZ5YxjeplkpMtSIADcJU= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kYXdQfL4CjYgw/2Izlxndvbskko3xX2p3ECbzqrXtNQh3IW66Vbmvsw6OtTskDMEuu hWPNbJn9AdEKRfsMzcQitxme5Yz79gOeEB1ee6KgYEAUjUbBKFDP3Gtu7o6xHj3dbW0S MRd9O6Cd96EAa4S2lj/L0ks4syr9Gk6upPJxo= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thanks for all the responses so far on this. One interesting factor which applies both to induction and earth mode (conduction) communication at VLF is the inverse cube law for attenuation. The upside of this is that if you are only trying to cover much more modest distances (1-2kms say) then the power needed is a LOT less than that to achieve twice this range or to try for DX by true radiation. Clearly there ends up being two distinct groups here (a) those who will be using lots of power and big antennas who should be able to get some useful amount of RF radiated below 9kHz and who have a chance of spanning some significant distances (possibly hundreds of kms), and (b) those using far more modest power levels who will only realistically be able to transmit by conduction or induction over quite local ranges. Although I shall be in the latter group because of my very limited garden size I'll be more than willing to try to receive stations seriously attempting real distance sub-9kHz. Personally, I've quite enjoyed this whole area of discussion. 73s Roger G3XBM On 11 March 2010 20:54, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote: If I've asked this before please forgive me.... -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: XGJ, Warren Ziegler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Stn on abt 501.72 testing -18:00/18:30 UTC, M0FMT |
Previous by Thread: | LF: VX9MRC, jcraig |
Next by Thread: | LF: Stn on abt 501.72 testing -18:00/18:30 UTC, M0FMT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |