All we need is a wire strung between K2
and Everest summits and fed from
base camp
below?
-----Original Message-----
From:
[email protected][mailto:
[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Warren Ziegler
Sent: 22 February 2010
16:23
To:
[email protected]Subject: Re:
LF: VLF_8.79 kHz
No license is required in the US below
9kHz.
I agree with Mal its very difficult to radiate a
signal on 137kHz, let
alone 9kHz!
--
73 Warren
K2ORS
WD2XGJ
WD2XSH/23
WE2XEB/2
WE2XGR/1
On Mon,
Feb 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM, ALAN MELIA <
[email protected]>
wrote:
>
Hi as far as the Uk is concerned it is not allowed. You
probably need to
contact Andy G4JNT for details he did
approach the regulator at one time
maybe around 2001/2 when
Geri was doing his tests the answer as I
remember
was:-
> Frequencies below 10kHz are not
allocated by International Treaty but we
control all
frequencies between DC and gamma rays, and no we will not
be
issuing any licences for that region.
>
> I
believe that was the RadioCommunications Agency things may be
different
now with Ofcomm. The best person to know whether
an approach would be
worthwhile would be John Gould G4WKL
who nursed the 500k stuff through.
>
> Alan
G3NYK
>
> --- On Mon, 22/2/10,
Stefan_Schäfer
<
[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>> From: Stefan_Schäfer <
[email protected]>
>>
Subject: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz
>> To:
[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, 22 February, 2010,
11:32
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Ok Roger,
>>
>>
>>
>> And
do you know if f<9kHz is free for other countries
in
>> europe as
>> well? What about the
UK?
>>
>>
>>
>> If such a
grounded dipole is best, than it is easy to build
>>
a big
>> antenna without the problems we have on LF
(getting the
>> wire high above
>> ground).
So we also could try big/long antennas. Waht do
>>
you mean with
>> amateur levels? Power range is
clear, something arround
>> 500W+-6dB.
But
>> the antenna? Sure, if you think about building
an antenna
>> in the
>> garden, say 2x20m,
is not very effective but what about
>> 2x500m in
a
>> forrest, perhaps with the loading coils (which
will be on a
>> ferrite
>> toroid i think)
mounted 300m apart from the center? That
>> could
be
>> interesting and easy to try. No tower, no earth
radials,
>> just 2 wires
>> hung up on some
trees and measured the impedance at the
>> feed
point,
>> that would be a first
step.
>>
>> This antenna will still be bad
but what we are doing -on LF
>> it is the
>>
same- is beeing fascinated to reach a good distance
and
>> make some
>> contacts at very low
frequencies, although it would be much
>> easier
on
>> 40/80m...
>>
>> And so, if
one would reach 50km with such a short dipole,
>>
the
>> fascination would be enormous, isn't it?
;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> Has
anyone, except Horst, tried such experiments as
well?
>>
>>
>>
>> With the
ground wave, one could reach the whole europe, i
>>
expect. But
>> that are
dreams...
>>
>>
>>
>>
Stefan/DK7FC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Am 22.02.2010 11:03, schrieb Roger
Lapthorn:
>>
>> At this frequency,
widely spaced, grounded
>> electrode pairs
are
>> probably the best "antenna". There
are
>> references to how these work in
>>
the literature (for example NATO AGAARD papers from
the
>> 1960s,
>> available on the internet I
believe) and on one of the
>> German ham
sites
>> (DK8KW) - see
http://www.qru.de/#vlf .
>>
>>
Don't expect great ranges: up to 10kms is a
fair
>> aim with modern
>> signal
processing technology and reasonable (amateur
>>
levels) available
>> power. Project Sanguine achieved
worldwide coverage to
>> submarines at
>>
76Hz (yes Hertz!) but used enormous power and
antennas
>> stretching for
>> 100s of
kms.
>>
>> 73s
>>
Roger
G3XBM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
2010/2/22 Stefan Schäfer
>> <
[email protected]>
>>
>>
Hello
Horst,
>>
>>
>>
>> That
sounds really nice. If it would be easy to find
some
>> motivated OMs
>> in the near field
(31km) ;-), that would be an interesting
>> field
to
>>
test.
>>
>>
>>
>>
Yesterday i have thought about possible antenna
>>
configurations for that
>> range and got the idea
that one could use a forrest as an
>>
antenna
>> tower. There, you could hang up 100s
meters of wire, in
>> series and in
>>
parallel. You do not need to have that area beside
your
>> house. Nobody
>> will see the wire
and nobody will care about it.
>>
>> Since
summer 2007 i have a horizontal loop antenna
mounted
>> in some
>> trees on my hill with
excellent results on all HF bands and
>> also
160m.
>> The loop has 130m and is mounted up to 12m
above ground.
>> Perfect
>> matching from
160m to 10m with my symmetric tuner. I even
>>
tried
>> matching on 2200m without a problem but with
bad ODX
>> results, of
>> course. But if one
would try 2x 10*100m on VLF, the ODX
>> would
be
>>
interesting...
>>
>>
>>
>>
JO30OT is abt 160km from JN49IS and thus a little far
i
>> think
;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> What is
your RX antenna and have you already catched some
>>
commercial
>> VLF stations in that range? Are there
some?
>>
>>
>>
>> 73,
Stefan
>>
>>
>>
>> PS: One
can be sure that there will never be SSB operation
>>
;-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
Von:
[email protected]>>
im Auftrag von Horst
Stöcker
>>
>>
>> Gesendet: Mo
22.02.2010 09:29
>>
>> An:
[email protected]>>
>>
>>
Betreff: RE: LF: AW: Beaconing on 8.79 kHz in
QRSS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Hallo Stefan,
>>
>>
>>
>>
there was a notice in Funkamateur 12/05, S. 1287, that
in
>> DL the range
>> <9kHz is
free.
>>
>>
>>
>> I could
not believe that so I asked the BNetzA and after a
>>
while I got
>> a letter which confirmed
that.
>>
>>
>>
>> So there
nothing you've got to do for getting a
>> licence.
You do not
>> need
one.
>>
>>
>>
>> There is
no limitation of technical parameters like
>>
bandwith or
power.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hard to
believe in german, but obviously
true.
>>
>>
>>
>> My QTH
is Siegburg
JO30OT
>>
>>
>>
>>
Horst
>>
>>
___________________________________________________________
>>
>>
NEU: Mit WEB.DE DSL über 1000,- ¿
sparen!
>>
>>
http://produkte.web.de/go/02/>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
>>
>>
>>
>>
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/>>
>>
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk>>
>>
http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM>>
>>
G3XBM GQRP 1678
ISWL
>>
G11088
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
>> ----------------------------
>>
Dipl.-Ing. Stefan Schäfer
>> Institut für
Umweltphysik der Universität
>>
Heidelberg
>> Im Neuenheimer Feld 229
>>
D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
>>
>>
[email protected]>>
Phone: (+49) (0)6221 546387
>> Fax: (+49) (0)6221
546405
>>
>>
www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de
>>
>>
>>
>
>