Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level
From: "Johan H. Bodin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:44:09 +0100
In-reply-to: <931424D0B09442018D818E6AD1E5A63A@White>
References: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B18@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <70718ADC6A924E2F9BA6C5F1294DAD14@JimPC> <931424D0B09442018D818E6AD1E5A63A@White>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
Jay, Marcus, LF,

[email protected] wrote:
...
> There appeared to be a noticeable quiet spot in the
> waterfall between ~ 8 and 9 kHz. I didn't investigate
> if this was an anomoly in the system or if there happens
> to be a quiet spot at that frequency.

When sferics are weak or absent, I often see a "dark band" in that
region, even with a nonresonant antenna (for example an E-field probe
which is "flat").


Markus Vester wrote:
...
> Part of the discrepancy
> could be that published figures inevitably include the energy of the
> distict spherics, which may well contribute the dominant part of the
> average noise power.

Yes, and that is probably why ITU's published figures show such a huge
difference between summer and winter. The radio spectrum emitted by
lightning discharges has a broad "hump" around 10kHz so it is a good
idea to hurry up with the experiments now before the northern hemisphere
moves into the QRN season. ;-)


73
Johan SM6LKM


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>